RSS RSS Subscribe

Posts tagged: bot

Driver Cleaners – New Snake Oil Products?

By , September 13, 2009 14:52
Hot:

Well I’m now seeing the trend in Driver Cleaner products becoming all the rage.  Buy software to remove old drivers.  In the past I’ve never had issues trying to upgrade drivers UNLESS I changed manufacturer.  Like if I went from ATI to nVidia or vice versa, I’d have problems.  Today when I do this I don’t see the same problems, just uninstall the old and install the new.

Continue reading 'Driver Cleaners – New Snake Oil Products?'»

DiggRedditRead It LaterGoogle ReaderYahoo MailSlashdotWordPressIdenti.caStumbleUponMySpaceLinkedInDeliciousLiveJournalHotmailAsk.com MyStuffBlogger PostBookmark/FavoritesGoogle BookmarksFacebookTwitterOrkutShare

Editorial: Understanding why Malware infects your PC

comments Comments Off
By , February 19, 2009 14:54
Hot:

I saw this comment today on a malware site and I normally read them to see how folks troll malware sites looking for blame.
Folks, malware is your problem, not anyone elses.  I am constantly reminded how people fail to understand that its their actions and choices that cause the infections, and today social engineering is a big reason.
Even malware experts are not immune from falling victim to their tricks.  Its been like this for years and outside of the increase in targetted attacks,
its still the #1 reason.

Continue reading 'Editorial: Understanding why Malware infects your PC'»

DiggRedditRead It LaterGoogle ReaderYahoo MailSlashdotWordPressIdenti.caStumbleUponMySpaceLinkedInDeliciousLiveJournalHotmailAsk.com MyStuffBlogger PostBookmark/FavoritesGoogle BookmarksFacebookTwitterOrkutShare

Windows 7 Beta – Open to Public

comments Comments Off
By , January 13, 2009 14:47
Hot:

Microsoft has announced Windows 7 is now open for public download.

There are many conditions and it’s a timed-beta common with many Windows beta products. You will require a Windows Live ID to connect to the download site, submit a bit of personally identifiable information, and you will then be given a download choice for 32 bit or 64 bit. I chose both. Then you will be given a java download manager which will then provide you with a location for saving the ISO’s for each download.

You will then need to be able to burn DVD ISO’s in order to get any use from this. Instructions are available on the download page, but I highly recommend that you also review the Installation instructions.

So head on over to the Windows Beta site before the beta download experience is over!!

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/dd353205.aspx

DiggRedditRead It LaterGoogle ReaderYahoo MailSlashdotWordPressIdenti.caStumbleUponMySpaceLinkedInDeliciousLiveJournalHotmailAsk.com MyStuffBlogger PostBookmark/FavoritesGoogle BookmarksFacebookTwitterOrkutShare

Viewsonic VX922 are defective monitors

By , December 11, 2008 14:37
Hot:

It seems that Viewsonic has had a lot of problems with its manufacturing over the course of the last several years. The reviews from 2005/2006 indicate that Viewsonic was a premier supplier of flat panel displays.

Since it is well know that most of the actual displays are purchased from the few suppliers of such beasts, Viewsonic is responsible for building the hardware around the display.

Back in 2006 (you could see our article here) we bought two VX922 monitors and they worked fine until Sping of 2008. At that time we started experiencing problems with the monitor staying synced and displaying a picture, at least thats how it seemed.

At that time we started seeing one of our monitors (the one used the most) would simply black out, the green power light would go out, then the green light would come back on, the display would flicker and then both would go black again. It would simply keep cycling this process over and over.

I found that PLAYING with the power button would get the display to stabilize, sometimes smacking the monitor would get it to work. When I discovered this, I realized it was a manufacturing defect.

By the End of September I grew tired of the problem and decided to get it fixed. I contacted Viewsonic support at 1-888-688-6688, and reported the problem. I had troubleshooted it and confirmed it was the monitor. Having two monitors and two identical video cards and multiple PCs made this work fairly straight-forward. I was able to get everything to work except the monitor.

When I contacted Viewsonic on September 25th, they stated they would go ahead and REPLACE the unit. I would have to ship it to their repair depot (3rd party service company, Pro something solutions…) in Edmonton and they would advance a unit the same day.

First of all, they said they would same day replace the unit, and the Viewsonic representative confirmed this company had a unit in stock. They did not. The unit I shipped arrived September 26th, and they did not ship until the 3rd of October, so this was a blatant falsehood or an outright lie. If they gave proper instructions to the repair depot which is highly questionable at this point, the depot did not follow them. They also did not ship a replacement as promised. Regardless I did not really care, as long as I got a working monitor in return.

[page_break]

Well I called on October 3rd to see what was going on and found out it shipped that day. I received my package on the 10th of October via CanPar. I was actually shocked to see this package, it was the EXACT SAME box I shipped on the 25th, very badly mangled and the bottom of the box was falling out. The driver even made a point in laughing about the packaging job. It turns out, they decided to FIX my monitor instead of replacing it, and then shipped it back on the day expected. This was NOT a replacement, nor SAME DAY service that VIEWSONIC told me I could expect.

We have a saying in customer service…under promise, over deliver. These guys WAY over promised and then did not bother nor CARE about the issue when I contacted them back about this.

When I opened the box there was light damage to the monitor, and the screen was scratched. I asked Viewsonic if a damage claim was made, and no such thing was done. I was shocked that a repair depot would be so careless and reckless sending fragile goods anywhere.

At this stage they decided to agree to advance replace the unit, but I had to send purchase details to them. Ok, so I did. I got two rejections that took until the 20th to clear up. On the 15th of October my second monitor started to fail. So now I call about this one. I asked VIEWSONIC to add this to the existing RMA, but they refused and instead decided to create a new one. Later I was told that this was the wrong procedure. Since I was dealing with two I had to make sure they had both in the system for processing. This took amazingly long for something that is fill a document and fax it back. They lost parts of the fax. Somehow they received page 1 but never received page 2. They blamed me for fax transmission problems, when I later discovered that faxes are emailed to the appropriate department, and they process them via email. Since they had page 1 but not 2 or 3 I could not understand how they messed this up, until I found out that they attach the faxes as TIF images, and multiple pages become a multiple part TIF. So the operator was careless and discarded it after reading the first page. Quite obvious now. Any apologies for this? No. So I again spend countless hours on the phone discussing this and faxing again, and confirming again.

So, after finalizing the details for the second I now have confirmations for the replacements and they are sent out. Within a few days I get the first one, the second one comes after about 4 days. Yes one was expedited, the other was ground. Wow, lovely. At any point we setup the replacements they work fine, seem to be ok, then we ship the old units back at the end of the week.

I was quite surprised to find two separate units, each a different shade of black and missing plugs for the back mounts. No big deal, I pilfered those from the originals and sent them back missing. But looking at two monitors side by side that were identical and now are not is a little bothersome. I certainly will keep them.

So by Nov 11th we finally had everything squared away. I have replacements and they have the originals. At this point I was hoping to never have to deal with Viewsonic again after this.

Well I was actually quite disappointed this morning while I was working I caught some flashing in the corner of my eye, and lo and behold, monitor #1 has started it\\\’s flickering again.

First call to Viewsonic, and I am not happy. I just got standard policy and careless responses to my questions. Stated they would only do a repair due to the age of purchase. I told her that was obviously wrong since I just had these items replaced by advance replacement not a month ago, so the age isn\’t a factor. I called this whole process incompetent and was left on ignore hold. I gave up after 15 minutes and called back.

Now, the monitor I had FIXED worked, but was damaged, the second monitor failed during the course of dealing with the first issue. If the first rep had said they would fix it and return it, I would have been ok with it THEN. If the repair depot had a good understanding of HOW TO PACKAGE GOODS FOR SHIPMENT, then I would not have had many issues and I would have been a happy client.

Instead, I had a new order (replacing 3 CRTS with LCDS) with my supplier, and had ordered the Viewsonics, since they were the best for the buck. After Oct 20th, I canceled the order and changed it to some really nice Samsungs (sorry do not have the models handy). I have had excellent service dealing with the local Samsung rep, the Viewsonic one never bothered to return my call back in 2004 when I was seeking vendors. I simply saw that two of the EXACT same monitors having the EXACT same problem could be a model or manufacturing defect. If its the latter then any Viewsonic monitor could fail at some point. I was not taking this chance.

So we called back, and now no amount of button pushing could get us to the english queue. Every button routed us to the spanish speaking operators. Finally someone spoke english, and transfered me to the english queue. This time I went back to RMA instead of tech support. Speaking to a lady who called herself Zorley (I hope I spelt that right) who was very attentive and listened and took notes about my issues. I am now awaiting a call back from a supervisor who will advise me what they want to do. I explained that this is an obvious issue and that Viewsonic must be aware of it, but there is no disclosure of the failure rate of these monitors. I would NOT buy a used one!!! Your buying a lemon if you do.

What DO YOU think Viewsonic should do in this case? I welcome your feedback on this concern.

Is my concern just me or a bigger problem?

Well here is a link to google with the search criteria I submitted to see if others have had this same problem. Search tags are: VIEWSONIC VX922 PROBLEM:

Massive number of results, try it and see.

The top five posts from that I included here:

http://www.fixya.com/support/p449204-viewsonic_vx922_19_monitor

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/247964-33-viewsonic-vx922-monitor-black-screen-green-power-light-flashes

http://www.swotti.com/monitors/viewsonic-vx922-19-lcd_14207_problems.htm

http://www.geekstogo.com/forum/Monitor-Problems-ViewSonic-VX922-t181202.html

http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies-archive.cfm/513718.html

So you can see, many folks from all over the planet are complaining about these monitors. My assumption is this is a very large manufacturing defect and is likely to affect other models. However since the exact nature has never been disclosed by Viewsonic it will not be possible without breaking NDA to find out the real details.

But this issue has completely put me out of the market when it comes to buying Viewsonic. I hope to later track down where they units where made, and find out what that firm builds besides Viewsonics. Since its likely going to affect many other monitors. But at this stage I can conclude the VX922 is a great gaming monitor until it fails. Then just chuck it in the garbage and buy a new monitor. (…chuck in the recycle bin…)

Should you buy another Viewsonic? I won’t be…ever, and I certainly will not recommend them to any client current or future. Since you all could be future clients I’m advising you not to. Also buy an extended warranty ONLY if it means you can avoid dealing directly with the manufacturer. I highly recommened this for any flat panel display simply due to the poor production value of these units.

DiggRedditRead It LaterGoogle ReaderYahoo MailSlashdotWordPressIdenti.caStumbleUponMySpaceLinkedInDeliciousLiveJournalHotmailAsk.com MyStuffBlogger PostBookmark/FavoritesGoogle BookmarksFacebookTwitterOrkutShare

Blog Spammers – NetCatHosting #1 Spammer Sept/07

comments Comments Off
By , October 17, 2007 13:40
Hot:

If you have a web site, chances are you deal with spam in some way. It’s become reality in the last couple years and dealing with it can be either finicky and time consuming or you spend very little time with it, thanks to effective solutions.

Here we get lots of spam even though the traffic here doesn’t warrant it. 90% of the visitors here are bots and only about 2% of those are spammers.

We have a great system for dealing with spam and so far we’ve had great success with it. No spam has been posted on this site that had to be manually removed. However we get an endless number of attempts.

One IP 195.225.177.190 has been particularly mindless in their attempt to spam our site got up to 10 to 15 attempts per day. During the latter part of September 2007, this ONE BOT generated over 100 attempts.

This is the detail of the identified spammer.

10/17/07 11:25:56 whois 195.225.177.190@whois.geektools.com

whois -h whois.geektools.com 195.225.177.190 …

GeekTools Whois Proxy v5.0.4 Ready.

Final results obtained from whois.ripe.net.

Results:

% This is the RIPE Whois query server #1.

% The objects are in RPSL format.

%

% Rights restricted by copyright.

%
See http://www.ripe.net/db/copyright.html

% Note: This output has been filtered.

% To receive output for a database update, use the "-B" flag.

% Information related to ’195.225.176.0 – 195.225.179.255′

inetnum: 195.225.176.0 – 195.225.179.255

netname: NETCATHOST

descr: NetcatHosting

country: PA

admin-c: VR1273-RIPE

tech-c: VR1273-RIPE

status: ASSIGNED PI

mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-PI-MNT

mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-HM-PI-MNT

mnt-by: NETCATHOST-MNT

mnt-routes: NETCATHOST-MNT

mnt-routes: WZNET-MNT

source: RIPE # Filtered

remarks: ***************************************

remarks: * Abuse contacts: abuse@netcathost.com *

remarks: ***************************************

person: Vladislav Radchek

address: IBC Tower Floor 9 PO Box 901-2389

address: Manuel Espinosa Batista Avenue

phone: +372 7121250

nic-hdl: VR1273-RIPE

source: RIPE # Filtered

% Information related to ’195.225.176.0/22AS31159′

route: 195.225.176.0/22

descr: NETCATHOST (full block)

mnt-routes: WZNET-MNT

mnt-routes: NETCATHOST-MNT

origin: AS31159

mnt-by: NETCATHOST-MNT

remarks: ****************************************

remarks: * Abuse contacts: abuse@netcathost.com *

remarks: ****************************************

source: RIPE # Filtered

% Information related to ’195.225.177.190/32AS31159′

route: 195.225.177.190/32

descr: Mark Stosberg

origin: AS31159

mnt-by: NETCATHOST-MNT

source: RIPE # Filtered

remarks: *******************************

* Mark Stosberg *

* +1 (202) 657-5440 *

* US, 47374, Indiana *

* Richmond, 914 E Main St *

****** Send abuse to: *********

* abuse@myfreepages.org *

*******************************

Results brought to you by the GeekTools WHOIS Proxy

Server results may be copyrighted and are used with permission.’,'This IP is part of the NETCATHOST.COM Domain and is a Web hosting provider. Two IP’s in this block were attributed in the spamming the one noted above and this one 195.225.176.177. This is a RIPE address space from the looks of it being used by an ISP in Europe and further used by this American either intentionally or otherwise. Given it’s a web hosting account I’d say the server has been compromised.

It was interesting that while these bots were spamming me, I received no other spam attempts. [well there were two] Once I blocked this IP block from accessing my site, the other bots started up again. Most curious.

I still average about 3 spam attempts per day and depending on the success of this article I may post further major spammers in the coming months.

DiggRedditRead It LaterGoogle ReaderYahoo MailSlashdotWordPressIdenti.caStumbleUponMySpaceLinkedInDeliciousLiveJournalHotmailAsk.com MyStuffBlogger PostBookmark/FavoritesGoogle BookmarksFacebookTwitterOrkutShare

Theme by Themocracy