RSS RSS Subscribe

Posts tagged: torrent

Google Chrome OS Is Available For Building Or Downloading

comments Comments Off
By , November 27, 2009 18:14
Hot:

I wasn’t going to get into this too much since the download is one you’ll have to build and I didn’t want to go through all the motions to make this happen.  But it appears someone has created a Virtual Machine (VM) you can use to try it out.

http://gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/download/ is the place to get it at.  You will need to create an account on the site (free), download a copy of Chrome OS which they offer a link to do that and you’ll need a VM platform to get it working.  VMWare is what it’s designed for, but VirtualBox can also use vmware images but there could be issues (not all work perfectly) as you’ll see from the site.

http://www.vmware.com/products/player — To Get Vmware Player.  If you have a Mac you can use Fusion, and it should work find on other VMWare products.

http://www.virtualbox.org — To get VirtualBox, but I’d recommend installing it from your distributions repository for full support, other wise you’re on your own updating it and all that fun stuff.

http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/eula_dev.html — Source from Google, may have to jump through some hoops to download it

http://gdgt.com/google/chrome-os — To Get Chrome OS ready to go.

Note: all these links can be found on gdgt.com directly from the first link in this article.  I include them for convenience.

Also you can review TechCrunch’s web site that will give you some step-by-step instructions along with a torrent link to download it from also

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/19/guide-install-google-chrome-os/

Have fun!

Ubuntu 9.10 “Karmic Koala” Release Candidate – Installation Notes

comments Comments Off
By , October 25, 2009 13:11
Hot:

Released to the public on October 22 Canonical’s latest and greatest Ubuntu yet “Karmic Koala 9.10“.  For many folks using a Linux distribution probably ranks up there with a visit to the dentist, but I have to say that as the kernel keeps improving in leaps and bounds the software wrapped around it can just work on the majority of hardware without issue.

Sure many folks may try it out and find out that it ‘does not work’ with their specific hardware, but compared with last years 8.10 the numbers are down with the sad exception of two particular vendors; ATI and Intel.  ATI recently dropped support for much of their older hardware, but then released a new series of drivers that do support.  Thankfully using the older drivers or using the open source communities versions can at least get them working, if you have problems with the more supported drivers.  Intel on the other hand has basically thrust it’s middle finger up at the linux community with a blatant refusal to provide open source to allow many distributions to be able to integrate support, so for many it means booting to a broken system, and downloading proprietary drivers and praying it works.  Obviously this isn’t the end of the world, but from my perspective a seriously ‘good’ reason to avoid using Intel hardware,  especially if you want to use wine to run Windows games or applications, you’d do so much better with non-Intel chipsets.  nVidia has the best support out of the box for most people not only linux users, but also windows users that it’s becoming a staple requirement.  Don’t get me wrong, Intel does provide drivers, but do not expect them to work directly from installation.  In some cases the generic drivers get installed and it works, in other cases you’re faced with non-working hardware and off to the various support forums seeking a solution.  Thankfully they are available.

In my situation I decided to get a new laptop and specifically bought a Compaq CQ60 which features NO Intel or ATI hardware, simply so I could avoid any hassles.  I’m pretty good at fixing these issues, but if I am spending money and the amount is equal, why buy something with hardware that will not work?    So without further adieu, I release my notes on installing Ubuntu 9.10 x64 on this laptop.

Continue reading 'Ubuntu 9.10 “Karmic Koala” Release Candidate – Installation Notes'»

Vista Beta Experience – 1. AV Installation

comments Comments Off
By , July 4, 2006 15:07
Hot:

Well as my previous blog item indicated I’ve gotten Vista installed on VMWare.   I’m still debating about actually using a  PC to do a full install as I feel I may wipe this and start fresh again.

It’s a good thing I’m not a rush out and upgrade everything person such as I was in the past.  Yes, I used to be terrible at getting the latest code/beta’s and hardware and throwing it together and hoping it works.  With tear apart PC’s this is ok, but for production work or serious gaming boxes one needs stability.  Rushing the latest OS or patch just to eliminate a bug or add a feature are nice reasons one needs to ensure that everything that was, still is, and everything we expect to be, will be.  Today I’ve been burned by so many upgrades that either broke itself or something else that I’ve gotten very particular about what I install and what I don’t.  On my companies web page we review many software and seldom does a package achieve better than a 70%.  It’s just very hard to find a good documented piece of software that acutally does what it states without issues.  Even some old favorites don’t score as high as would be expected.

This is something that seems lost with many IT professionals, but moreso with Marketing folks than the technical folks.  Yes rush out and get that new update, you’ll appreciate it.  Really?  Thank god for Virtual Machines.  When it comes down to Vista patching during the beta is something that will just have to be done, but at what point does it lose focus with my needs?

 


Why you don’t need every upgrade or patch.

My main gaming PC is currently running XP SP1 as I also use this as my main chat and torrent machine.  SP2 showed that it put ‘Microsoft’s idea of security’ ahead of the user, and did things that simply are not required for experienced PC users.   I saw more problems that I decided not to upgrade this machine.  It has caused a lot of problems and as a result to changes to the way Microsoft allows access to it’s updates I no longer get automatic updates on this box.  I can still get them manually and download them, but I hesitate to say that for the most part I don’t even worry about it.  I checked and with the exception of two critical patches in the last year that had to be installed, I haven’t installed any patches or updates on this machine in 18 months.  It’s quite unlikely that for the life of this box (another two years max) I will probably never upgrade this again.  Will Windows stop working or break?  Unlikely it’s working fine now, and since I’m not changing any componants or core kernals functions or adding new unwanted functionality it will remain that way until it dies of a natural death.  This box has been well protected for it’s entire life and the last thing I needed was Microsoft adding features that dumbed down my protection since most users are not aware.   The key is not to allow malware to get on this machine.  To date we’ve been very successful and only now are we seeing others adopt my solutions that have been used since 1996. 

Vista – Latest dummy-proof OS
When it comes to dumbed down, it seems that Vista is king at this.  If my experience with Vista doesn’t improve from newbie-land soon I shall say that I’ll never adopt Vista as too immature of an OS.  I realize how that sounds given all the really cool features implemented but really, many of these cool features can be had elsewhere, other linux distro’s, third party tools to add to XP.   Where I could really use some dummying down is with the error messages and the parlance of the ‘event viewer’.

When you have a problem do you think you get a sensible error message?  No.  It seems the ‘operation’ is dummy-proof, but ‘configuration’ is left cryptic.  Why can’t I have better control of my PC out of the box?  It seems this type of internal schism to the operation of the desktop is tantamount when dealing with any Microsoft product or tool.  When Microsoft cannot adopt their own ideas fully, I should not either.  Neither should you.  Of course this is a beta product so final remarks will wait until it\’s release.

I have Vista installed and running at this point from fresh install.  The security center is complaining bitterly about not having an AV installed on it.  I really don’t need one but to get rid of this annoying red X in my systray I’ve been attempting to install something.

Bitdefender v10 beta.  First choice, says it runs on all Windows OS.  Does not install, unknown error.

Kapersky v6 beta.  Second choice, does not claim to run on Vista.  Does not install, incompatible OS.

PC-Cillan – The Microsoft recommended Vista Beta Product.  Does not install, incompatible OS.

OF course every single tool used MSI to install, so my guess is it never got past unpacking it then it checked.

Why don’t they check before you download and waste all that bandwidth?  I guess they’d rather waste the bandwidth.  I don’t.

So, I’m not impressed with Vista’s installation ability, since there does seem to be a disconnect between what works and what doesn’t with both Vista as an OS and the vendors supplying their tools.

And I still have that red X in my systray…..

World of Warcraft SUCKS … your bandwidth when you don\’t know it

comments Comments Off
By , April 3, 2006 10:56
Hot:

I have played, well I did play World of Warcraft (WoW) when it first was released.  Not much anymore even though I’m thinking I may get back into it again.

However when I hear stories such as this, I recall why I quit playing WoW in the first place.  For those who don\’t know me, I’m an avid beta tester and MMORPG gamer.  I’ve played nearly every game ever released, ever.  Well except those I did not want to play.  If enough people ask me I may sit down and count all the games I’ve played.

Right, now why did I quit playing Wow?  Well the game was fun, easy if not as painful as others when it came to moving around the planet, the graphics were great, and there are enough elements to make this very entertaining.  Guilds and teams were well designed but the PvP could have been improved but it works for not creating two parts to the same world.

No it wasn’t even the cost.  I loved the game card idea, since it saved one from having to risk a credit card on the internet (certainly not a wise idea).

So what was it?

Read more..

It was the constant patching. 

Yes Blizzard in their ignorance decided that bit-torrent would be the way to go.  This way they prevent entire nations populations from having to download patches from them.  Let everyone leech from each other.  Sounds good except.

It’s slower than molasses!  It takes forever to patch!  If you have a firewall (and who doesn’t these days) you have to open half the internet to the download.  Totally *censored*ing stupid!

The lead developer during E3 a few years back explained that it would be state of the art.  Well it’s only saved money for Blizzard, it certainly hasn’t bid them many friends or supporters.  However like most gamers I know..you don’t complain you just jump through the hoops.  Its a shame that such a good game is marred by one really bad design flaw, even though it means a large $$$ savings for the company. 


[Editors note: it could be worse, you could be downloading from premium pay websites WITHOUT a pay account]

[Writers note: it is...read more]

Blizzards latest patch is trying to improve this, but, yep you guessed it, *censored*ing it up even worse.

It appears that now the downloader is running contantly, and stealing bandwidth doing what bit torrents do…move torrents.  ISP’s especially have not been ignoring this increase in traffic, and you shouldn’t either.

Yes there is NOW a forum on DSLREPORTS.COM dealing with WoW.  What does this tell you.

Blizzard get a clue and replace this hapless method with something that doesn’t steal from your customers.

Arenasoft have the RIGHT idea…streaming updates…YES!! That is the way to go.

Until WoW patches get exploited….we’ll be here chuckling at all the stupidity
called ‘state of the art’.

Oh, and here’s the report from DSLREPORTS.com

There’s been ample grumbling this week about the 1.10 patch for World of Warcraft, because the Bit-Torrent based WOW game downloader now apparently runs all the time, slowly leeching your bandwidth, even when the updater isn’t running (a problem clearly for capped users). Blizzard responded to complaints by allowing users to disable the function, though some have had trouble getting it to work.

 

Blizzard responded to complaints by allowing users to disable the function, though some have had trouble getting it to work. Blizzard has also updated their FAQ on the matter.

In Other words…We aren’t doing a thing to make it better.  Suck it up paying (L)user!!
Now submit your credit card to me…yes you cannot resist even though you’ll have to spend 40 hours updating a month!!

Comments welcome.

Theme by Themocracy